Joe Stevens, Panel Agrees: Pay Athletes, QUEE Ed., Newsday, 8 Mar 1998, pp. C25.
College athletes would get paid in addition to having scholarships,
if the decision were up to a panel that met at St. John's Law School
this week.
The need to pay athletes was the consensus of a four-person panel
during a Thursday night discussion titled "The Plight of the Student
Athlete."
Randolph Scott-McLaughin, the moderator and a professor of law at
Pace University, insisted that the panel's view was not far-fetched,
despite opposition from the NCAA and some student-athletes.
"When you look at how Olympic athletes are now getting endorsements
and no longer have to be amateurs, and when you see the changes that
have made college sports a billion-dollar business," Scott-McLaughlin
said, "you can see that compensating college athletes is not that
radical of an idea."
No members of the panel, which was put together by the Center of
Constitutional Rights and the Black Law Students and the Entertainment
and Sports Law associations of St. John's University, voiced a
difference of opinion with the moderator. However, several audience
members challenged the panel in a question-and-answer session.
One audience member asked if all college athletes should receive
payment, or just the ones in high-profile, money-making sports, such as
Big East basketball, as opposed to fencing.
"This is not just big business," said Johan Powell, an attorney,
who added that all athletes should be paid. "This is huge business."
Even so, no one on the panel could offer concrete numbers or a plan
determining how much an individual athlete should be paid.
Panelist Lyndon D. Williams, an attorney, talked about the rigors of
being a student-athlete and how academics normally are sacrificed for
athletics. He mentioned several factors that compromise the education of
student-athletes.
Student-athlete Newton Gayle, formerly of Niagara and currently
playing basketball at Mount St. Mary's, added that most athletes on
scholarship have to maintain a 1.5 grade-point average in their freshman
year to stay in school. Those with academic scholarships must maintain a
3.0 GPA.
"The reality is most athletes are not educated when they leave
college," Williams said. "The athletes are stuck without an education,
or at least a meaningful education, and are lost."
Panelist Alice Crowe, an attorney whose specialty is helping
students with the recruitment process, agreed. She urges
student-athletes in high school to research potential colleges and make
sure they fully understand the terms and clauses in their scholarship.
She also said student-athletes should negotiate their scholarship
package whenever possible, even though institutions lead recruits to
believe scholarships are standard.
Crowe said she often sees universities revoke scholarships after
sub-par athletic performances, using certain clauses in the scholarship.
She pointed out that a scholarship "isn't a guarantee for an
education."
She added: "Athletes are more valuable than a regular student. They
bring in millions of dollars to the institution. And, because they put
on that school's emblem, they have to abide by all the rules of the
university. They are always upholding the image of the college or
university. A regular student isn't held to that standard."
She added as an example that if a non-athlete causes a ruckus in a
bar, few will hear about it. But if an athlete commits the same act, he
runs the risk of losing his scholarship for conduct unbecoming to the
institution.
A few St. John's athletes attended the discussion and talked about
their concerns. Andrew Prophet, a senior linebacker, said that many
student-athletes would like the university to start a program to help
them get jobs after graduation. He also said many athletes don't realize
that a " 'C' won't get you hired. You can play with a C average, but you
can't get a job when you graduate."
Prophet was not an advocate of athletes being paid, but there were
other athletes who favored the idea.
Lowes Moore, a former NBA player and panelist, said he has witnessed
many athletes leave college without a degree or a professional sports
career after graduation. "You really have to ask," Moore said. "Is
[college sports] about education or economics?"
Crowe had answered the question earlier in the discussion. "Myth
number one is that athletes are at a college for an education," she
said.
ON STUDENT ATHLETES
Alice Crowe, attorney - "This is a billion-dollar industry, [a student
athlete] can't go into it blindly."
Johan Powell, attorney - "Student-athletes believe they will develop
their [athletic] skills enough to move to the next level. They also
believe the coaching staff will help them in that goal. They don't think
about developing their [academic] skills . . . College athletics is a
huge business."
Lowes Moore, former New Jersey Net - "I lacked preparation for college
or a good understanding of what it took to be successful off the court.
Four years at West Virginia University and I left without a degree.
"I think most of the athletes just want an opportunity to make a
living when they leave the institution. At least be able to provide for
themselves and their families."
Lyndon D. Williams, attorney - "I think if the public is informed
about the student-athlete's plight, they will care. For those who don't
think they care, I'd say to them, `If you don't educate a person, you
have another person out on the streets [potentially] breaking into
houses.' . . . You have a better society if you have better-educated
people.
"The reality is most athletes are not educated when they leave
college. The demands of the sport take so much out of them that they
don't have anything left for their education."
Copyright 1998, Newsday Inc.